razor.blog: where philosophy meets the road.

On the Comfort of Tidy Lives

The encounter began with a small act of neighbourhood etiquette.
She had left the light on in her car. I noticed it in the evening and walked over to her house to tell her. A couple of days later we met again. She wanted to thank me with a jar of honey.

She is a young teacher and lives in a house that belongs to a Christian association. When I first heard that, I asked half-jokingly whether she was a priest. She laughed and said no, she was simply a believer.

From there the conversation moved quickly into familiar territory. Religion. Values. People we both knew.

It was a friendly conversation. She was warm, polite, completely pleasant. Yet I felt something subtle underneath it. A kind of quiet moral clarity. Not aggressive, not judgmental, but very certain.

The world seemed to fall naturally into place for her.

Some people are believers.
Some people are not.
Some people live properly.
Some people do not.

There was also a tone of optimism in the way she spoke about life. As if a good and orderly life were not only desirable, but also fairly attainable if one simply lived correctly.

And that is where I noticed a strange reaction in myself.

Part of me admired it.

Another part of me recoiled.

The Stream

In the late nineteenth century, the philosopher and psychologist William James described human thought as a stream of consciousness. Consciousness, he wrote, does not move in discrete steps. Thoughts, impressions, memories, and associations follow one another like water in a river. The movement is continuous and internal, shaped by the mind itself.

For James, the stream belonged to the inner life of the individual.

Today the metaphor still exists, but its direction has quietly reversed.

The stream no longer flows primarily within us.

It flows toward us.

Images, news, commentary, entertainment, catastrophe, political outrage, personal confession, everything arrives through a continuous current of screens, feeds, and timelines. The modern individual lives inside an externally produced stream that pours experiences, impressions, and stimuli into the mind without interruption.

What James described as the flow of thought has gradually been replaced by a flow of content.

The difference is not trivial.

James’s stream was shaped by attention, memory, and reflection. It belonged to the interior rhythm of the mind. The modern stream is engineered. It is structured by algorithms and optimized for engagement. It does not simply flow. It is designed to keep attention moving.

The mind no longer drifts through its own associations.

It scrolls.

One Reason Children Lose Respect for Adults

Sometimes a child behaves in a way that surprises adults.

A teacher speaks, and the child rolls her eyes.

The teacher gives instructions, and the child reacts with a kind of quiet mockery.

The usual explanations come quickly.

The child is disrespectful.

The child is testing limits.

The child is reacting against authority.

But sometimes these explanations miss the real mechanism.

Because the same child may have no difficulty with adults who are far stricter.

Imagine a child who has previously been taught by adults who are quite demanding.

They enforce rules.

They raise their voice occasionally.

They expect discipline.

And yet the child does not roll her eyes.

She does not mock them.

She cooperates.

Why?

It is tempting to say the child simply respects authority.

But that is not quite right.

The Slogan and the System

Some ideas move through institutions the way wallpaper moves through a room. Nobody remembers who put it there. Nobody examines it closely. Yet it quietly defines the atmosphere.

In many schools one such phrase is repeated almost ritualistically:

“School and parents are partners in education.”

The sentence sounds harmless. In fact, it sounds admirable. Cooperation between school and family seems obviously desirable. Who would argue against it?

And yet something interesting happens the moment one begins to look at the phrase more closely.

The sentence is extremely easy to produce. It takes perhaps three seconds to say. It carries the moral tone of harmony and shared responsibility. Once spoken, it subtly frames the conversation. If someone hesitates, it can even sound as if that person is opposing cooperation itself.

But if one tries to examine the statement seriously, the simplicity collapses almost immediately.

How Much Self-Critique Can a Culture Sustain Before It Undermines Itself

A culture that cannot criticize itself becomes rigid.

A culture that cannot stop criticizing itself dissolves.

Systematic self-critique is historically rare.

Most civilizations preserve. They justify. They remember what was done to them, not what they have done. They may reform under pressure, but they do not habitually place their own foundations under moral examination.

The sustained practice of turning standards inward, of interrogating one’s own history, power structures, and moral claims as a routine cultural activity, emerged gradually in the West.

Its early forms appear in classical Athens, where tragedy and philosophy questioned civic virtue and the gods. It deepened in Roman law, which formalized limits on power. It became metaphysical in Christian theology, where sin was internalized and confession institutionalized moral self-examination. It was radicalized during the Reformation, when religious authority itself was challenged from within. It became methodological in the Enlightenment, when reason was turned against tradition, monarchy, and church. And it was universalized in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, when critique extended to empire, race, capitalism, gender, and the civilizational project itself.

In scale and continuity, this pattern is unusual.

The Expiry Date of Razor Blades: Frame Transfer and Cognitive Autopilot in Everyday Retail Interaction

Abstract

This paper analyses a brief retail interaction in which a customer jokingly inquires whether discounted razor blades are reduced in price due to expiration. Although modern razor blades do not carry formal expiration dates, the cashier responds by searching the packaging for one. This micro-episode illustrates how institutional frames guide cognition, how category structures are transferred across domains without scrutiny, and how everyday reasoning prioritises procedural coherence over meta-level evaluation. Drawing on Kant’s theory of categorisation and Wittgenstein’s concept of language-games, the paper argues that the humour arises from the silent extension of a valid rule into an inapplicable context.

Germany as Seismograph

Germany has often been a laboratory of the future. Not because it invents the tendencies first, but because it amplifies them.

Germany does not drift. It commits.

Industrialization did not merely produce social reform. It produced a hyper-organised welfare blueprint under Otto von Bismarck.

Monetary crisis did not merely create recession. It produced hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic.

Nationalism did not merely harden into chauvinism. It became total mobilisation under the Nazi Party.

After 1945, pacifism was not a mood. It became structural military minimalism.

Climate policy did not remain a set of targets. It became Energiewende on maximum voltage.

European integration is not treated as a practical arrangement. It increasingly resembles a near-theological commitment.

Germany rarely invents the direction. It radicalises the intensity.

School Social Work: How the Map Eats the Territory

There is a quiet misunderstanding at the heart of school social work. It doesn’t announce itself. It doesn’t come as conflict or crisis. It settles in slowly, disguised as structure, as professionalism, as progress.

It begins with a simple shift.

The system draws a map. Procedures, frameworks, reporting lines, measurable outcomes. All of it reasonable. Necessary, even. No institution can function without some form of order.

But over time, something happens.

The map stops being a tool. It becomes the reality.

And the territory, the actual child sitting across the table, starts to disappear behind it.

A child is not a case. Not a trajectory. Not a cluster of indicators. A child is unstable ground. Contradictory. Shifting. One day open, the next closed. What looks like defiance may be fear. What looks like laziness may be exhaustion. What looks like indifference may be a quiet form of withdrawal that no report will ever capture.

To work with that requires something different.

Not a system, but a way of seeing.

The Customer Model of Citizenship

A man punches another driver’s windshield because someone honked. The police follow him. The officer approaches calmly. Voice low. Hands visible. No drama.

Ten minutes of explanation.

Ten minutes of patience.

And again and again the same sentence:

“Why are you doing this to me?”

Not shouted in rage. Not framed as revolution. It sounds wounded. Confused. Personally wronged.

Why are you doing this to me?

In another video, different man, routine traffic stop. Suspended license. The officer explains. The driver interrupts, complains, spirals. The same refrain surfaces:

You’re ruining my day.

Why are you doing this to me?

It is a peculiar tone. Not criminal. Not ideological. Transactional.

The officer is not experienced as an agent of impersonal law. He is experienced as a hostile service provider.

The interaction feels less like enforcement and more like a customer dispute.

That sentence reveals something larger than the stop itself.

Henry VIII: A Case Study in Executive Overreach

If you strip away the fur collars and oil paintings, reads less like a monarch and more like a long-term governance experiment with very weak institutional guardrails. More colloquially put: This jewellery wearing gym bro was basically a one-man constitutional crisis.

He inherited the throne in 1509, young, athletic, multilingual, brand compliant. Early messaging emphasized stability, continuity, and European partnership. His marriage to functioned as a high-value diplomatic merger with Spain. Foreign policy alignment: solid. Papal relations: cooperative. Domestic approval ratings: high.

Then came the succession crisis.

No surviving male heir meant long-term dynastic sustainability was at risk. From a governance perspective, this was not romantic dissatisfaction. It was risk mitigation. Unfortunately, the Vatican functioned as an external regulatory authority, and when Henry applied for a marital annulment, the compliance office, currently influenced by the Holy Roman Emperor who happened to be Catherine’s nephew, declined.

At this point, Henry did what any bold executive does when blocked by an external oversight body.

He restructured the institution.

The Polite Nudge

Let’s stop pretending.

Media has always shaped reality. Governments frame wars. Corporations frame products. News frames crises. Repetition becomes truth.

That was the old architecture.

The new one runs on code.

The Overton window used to move through argument. Loud, messy, public. Now it moves through ranking systems. Silent. Personalized. Invisible.

You are not silenced. You are calibrated.

When Ideology Feels Like Common Sense

I saw an image on the University of Bern’s social media feed and felt that familiar flicker of recognition. Three young women laughing in a tram. Bright winter light. Casual clothes. Public transport. Urban ease. One male face almost entirely cut off at the edge of the frame.

Nothing offensive. Nothing dramatic. I am a man. I drive a car, a Toyota Corolla to be precise. I do not feel attacked by this picture. And yet the image felt unmistakably typical.

Not accidental.

Universities do not post images by chance. They curate atmosphere. They stage values. They present a world as it should be seen.

The caption was about humor. How humor can unite or divide. A harmless, almost banal observation. But the image carried its own quiet instruction: even humor belongs within the correct moral scenery.

What Does Time Do?

My twelve year old daughter and I went back to the village where I was born.

It is not even a town. Teufen is just a small Swiss village, pressed gently into the Appenzeller landscape as if it had no ambition to be more than it is. I lived there until I was nine. From the house where I stayed with my grandparents, I used to walk to kindergarten and later to school. In my memory, that walk was long. I crossed wide fields, climbed mountains, moved through valleys. It felt heroic. A corridor of weather and mood. A daily expedition.

Now it takes a few minutes.

The path is narrow. The hills are low. The slope that once felt like a climb toward destiny is barely a rise. Everything is shorter than it used to be. Less dramatic. Less charged.

I had the strange sensation that I was too large for the place.

When the Mind Runs Hot

There was a time when distrust had a direction.

You distrusted a party. A newspaper. A politician. A bank. The anger had an address. Even the scandals of the 1970s had a center. A name. A crime. Hearings. Consequences. The system absorbed the shock and continued.

What we are living through now feels different.

It is not distrust of something.

It is distrust of everything.

Call it 360 degrees of anomie.

Durkheim described anomie as normlessness, the thinning of shared structure. In his era, erosion was vertical. Religion weakened. Tradition weakened. Industrialization destabilized communities. The old roof collapsed before a new one was built.

Today the erosion is spherical.

Upward, elites lose credibility. Sideways, media fragments. Downward, tradition thins. Inward, the individual faces infinite information and shrinking shared guardrails.

The last five years accelerated the rotation.

Forward Without Amnesia

An African philosopher in Germany wants to write about Nietzsche. He is told by the university, that perhaps he should write about African spiritualism instead. Witchcraft, maybe. Something closer to home. Something culturally rooted.

In the United States, commentators argue that certain voter registration requirements are too complex for Black citizens. Identification rules are burdensome. Online systems are confusing. The implication lingers beneath the language of care: modern bureaucracy may be too much to expect.

Both cases arrive wrapped in moral concern. They speak the language of inclusion. They reference history.

And yet something in them contracts.

The Infection Without a Virus

In 2019, teenagers in Germany began developing Tourette-like symptoms almost overnight.

They shouted obscenities in class.

They dropped into distorted voices mid-sentence.

They barked strange, specific phrases.

They performed elaborate motor tics.

Clinics filled. Families panicked. Some were heavily medicated. A few were evaluated for invasive procedures.

It was not Tourette syndrome.

Doctors noticed something unsettling: The symptoms were not random. They mirrored the YouTube personality Jan Zimmermann who documented his life with Tourette. His phrases. His vocal shifts. His gestures. Watched millions of times.

The teenagers were not acting.

Their distress was real.

Their symptoms were involuntary.

What spread was not a virus.

It was pattern.

We Have No Future

For most of human history, the future was repetition.

You were born where your father was born. You did what he did. The tools changed slowly. The beliefs changed slower. History moved like a glacier. Heavy, predictable, grinding forward but barely perceptible within a lifetime.

No one needed a vision. Survival was enough.

Then came rupture.

The American Revolution tore monarchy from legitimacy.
The French Revolution detonated hierarchy.
The Industrial Revolution shattered the rhythm of agrarian life.

For the first time, the future was not inheritance. It was construction.

The Enlightenment did not whisper. It declared that the world could be redesigned. Science would expand. Rights would expand. Wealth would expand. Humanity would expand.

It was arrogant. It was naïve. It was violent in its consequences. But it was forward.

Even the Romantics, suspicious of cold reason, were not stagnant. They warned that the machine could devour the soul. William Blake saw dark mills rising over London and sensed spiritual catastrophe. But he burned with vision. He did not want less future. He wanted a different one.

When the Depth Scares Them

Start a real conversation and watch the temperature drop.

At first it moves easily. Music. Travel. Work. Opinions about harmless things. Everyone is fluent there. The sentences are casual, bodies relaxed. Laughter comes without cost.

Then you go one layer deeper.

You say something that isn’t decorative. Something that does not exist to impress or entertain. Maybe you admit confusion. Maybe you question something sacred. Maybe you speak about fear without turning it into a joke.

The air changes.

It is almost physical. Shoulders stiffen. Eyes lose their softness. The room does not explode. It contracts.

And then it happens.

Someone reaches for a name.

Nietzsche. Jung. Peterson. Naval. Or the canonized voice of the opposite ideological camp.

The quote lands like a sandbag on a rising flame.

It sounds intelligent. It sounds elevated. It sounds as if the conversation has been deepened.

It hasn’t.

The Calm Warrior

A few days ago, my twelve year old daughter asked me something serious. Not about school, not about friends, not about homework. She asked how to go through life? How to stay steady? How not to be pulled around by everything?

So I wrote this for her. Not as a lecture. Just as something she can carry with her while she grows.

You once told me you want to feel steady inside.

That is a beautiful wish. Most people do not even know they are looking for that.

Life will not always be calm. People will have moods. Friends will change. School will sometimes feel unfair. You will win sometimes, and you will lose sometimes. You cannot arrange the world so that it behaves perfectly. No one can.

But you can build something inside yourself that does not shake so easily.

The Last Horizon

Yesterday my daughter and I drove to France. Just across the Swiss border. Nothing dramatic. A few hours there, a few hours back.

On the return we sat in a traffic jam in the Basel tunnel. Engines humming. Nowhere to move.

We looked at each other and said the same thing.

Why did we even bother?

There was nothing in that short trip we could not have found at home.

Carry Your Center

This is about parenting.

Not the visible parts. Not school choices, hobbies, or rules about screen time. This is about the invisible layer underneath all of it. The atmosphere your child grows up breathing.

Some lives move in straight lines. School, work, retirement. The same street. The same bakery. Conversations that repeat until they harden into routine.

Other lives bend. They relocate. They restart. They lose and rebuild. Plans collapse. New terrain appears without warning.

If your life has moved like that, you may have wondered what it does to a child.

The danger is not the movement.

The danger is losing yourself inside it.

I Fight for My Feelings

There was a young woman standing in the street, holding a sign that read: I fight fascism. She was not shouting. She was not theatrical. She looked fragile, almost transparent with emotion. When someone asked her a simple question, What is fascism?, she began to cry.

She tried to answer. She said fascism meant the breakdown of society, that when there is fascism there is no society anymore. The sentence did not quite settle. It gestured toward collapse but did not describe a structure.

Then she said something far more revealing than any definition could have been.

“I fight for how I feel.”

“And I fight for others, of course.”

When she was asked what she felt, she replied, “Can’t you hear it in my voice?”

She could not name it.

It is tempting to laugh at such a moment. But I think that would be a mistake.

Epstein Files: Carry No Illusions

For a period of my life, I worked as private secretary to a very powerful man. A billionaire. Well known. He is dead now, and I have no interest in turning him into a character study. Names matter less than proximity. What matters is that I saw power from nearby.

It did not shock me that the powerful were connected to one another. Power behaves like weather systems. It clusters. It circulates. It creates its own pressure zones. Influence pulls influence into the same rooms. People meet not because they admire one another, but because gravity insists.

What stayed with me from that time was not outrage. It was recognition.

I was reading Montaigne then.

Crans Montana: When the Government Begins to Behave Like a Cartel

On January 1, 2026, shortly after one in the morning, a fire broke out in a cellar bar in Crans Montana, canton Valais. Within minutes, smoke turned the room into a sealed container. Forty people died. Nearly half were minors. Some were fourteen.

For Switzerland, this was not just a tragedy. It punctured a national myth.

We believe in layered regulation. In inspections. In redundancy. We believe that even if individuals fail, structures compensate.

In this case, they did not.

Stoicism Never Took the Red Pill

A bald man in dark glasses named Andrew Tate points at the camera. A recent article in the Süddeutsche Zeitung announces that Stoicism has “infected” the so called manosphere. Emotionally stunted men, we are told, are the carriers. The verdict is delivered before a single argument appears.

This is not criticism. It is moral stage lighting.

Take a philosophy that survived empires. Glue it to a controversial influencer. Let the association do the intellectual heavy lifting. No need to read Seneca. No need to touch Epictetus. Just point, imply, condemn.

That is not a serious analysis. It is reputational contagion dressed up as intellectual thought.

Stoicism becomes a prop in a culture war skit.

A Smackdown With Pure Reason

I tried to know the world

once.

Really know it.

Not the postcard version.

Not the goddamn brochure.

I leaned out the window of my skull

and asked reality

what the hell it was doing.

It didn’t answer.

So I drank cheap wine.

Then something stronger.

Then I noticed something ugly:

every time I touched the world

I left fingerprints.

The Political Nightmare

There was a time when politics at least pretended to justify itself. Facts were bent, interests disguised, motives cleaned for public use. But there was still a shared horizon. A common world that had to be addressed, even dishonestly. Persuasion mattered because something like reality was assumed to exist between opposing sides.

That horizon is gone.

Politics no longer argues with the world. It installs one. Whoever acts first defines the field. Whoever moves fastest creates the conditions to which everyone else must respond. Reality is no longer debated. It is promulgated. Political success is no longer tied to truth or coherence, but to speed, repetition, and institutional capture.

This is not a post-truth problem. It is an ontological shift. We have moved from a politics of justification to a politics of enactment.

Donald Trump did not invent this shift, but he understood it instinctively. His method was simple and effective: assert, repeat, move on.

When Intelligence Has Nowhere to Go

In the Spanish movie Sleep Tight (2011), the setting is an apartment building in Barcelona. A place held together by routines, habits, and a shared assumption of safety. People pass each other in hallways. Doors close. Life proceeds without drama.

At the center of this order is César, the concierge. Polite. Reliable. Present but barely noticed. He fixes things, keeps records, accepts packages. The kind of person residents trust without ever really seeing.

The film’s unease comes from how little it needs to do. No spectacle. No obvious threat. The tension grows from proximity and access. Safety is not shattered by an event, but eroded by something quiet and persistent. The building feels wrong not because anything happens, but because something already has.

César is the source of this disturbance. He is profoundly "unscheinbar".

Importing Meaning

In the 1960s, the Western left encountered an outcome its own theory had not prepared it for.

Marx had assumed that industrial capitalism would intensify exploitation until the working class could no longer bear it. Instead, capitalism adapted. Productivity gains were shared just enough. Wages rose. Credit expanded. Consumer goods multiplied. The worker was not immiserated into revolt but integrated into comfort.

The proletariat did not become a revolutionary subject. It became a stakeholder.

This was not a betrayal of capitalism’s logic. It was its refinement. Rather than confronting labor as an enemy, the system absorbed it through consumption, welfare, and status. Class conflict was not resolved; it was anesthetized.

Marx had underestimated the pacifying power of abundance.

By the mid-twentieth century, the Western working class no longer experienced itself as historically trapped. It experienced itself as upwardly mobile. Revolution ceased to feel necessary. And without necessity, revolutionary identity collapsed.

The left did not lose its moral energy at this point. It lost its subject.

Honmono: Authenticity as Residue

In Japanese, honmono (本物) means “the real thing.” At its simplest, it distinguishes what is genuine from what is imitation. Culturally, it goes further. Honmono names alignment. When what something is, what it does, and how it presents itself no longer contradict each other. It is not a label one applies to oneself. It is a verdict that appears slowly, often without ceremony.

Seen this way, honmono stands in quiet opposition to the modern economy of the self. Ours is a time in which identity is treated as a project. Curated. Narrated. Updated. One is expected to explain who one is, what one stands for, and where one is going. Honmono suggests something else. Do the thing consistently. Take care of what is in front of you. Let coherence emerge over time. If recognition comes, let it come by accident.

This is not uniquely Japanese.

Where the Line Begins to Move

Free speech in Europe is under pressure. Not abolished, not extinguished, but increasingly managed.

In one sense, this is understandable. We do not live in the 1950s anymore. Political ideas no longer move slowly through leaflets, local meetings, or delayed broadcasts. A sentence written in irritation can now reach millions within hours. Social media rewards escalation, collapses context, and turns private speech into public events almost instantly. Governments did not create this environment, and pretending otherwise would be naive.

States are therefore confronted with a real problem: how to prevent rapid escalation and social destabilisation without governing permanently in emergency mode. That tension is not imaginary.

But history is unambiguous on one point. The fact that regulation feels understandable does not mean it is harmless. Periods of technological acceleration have always tempted governments to tighten control in the name of order. Once restrictions are normalised as reasonable responses to new conditions, lines begin to blur.

The Swiss Village That Did Not Argue

There is a village that looks, at first glance, exactly the way a Swiss village should look. The houses are tidy. The sidewalks are clean. People greet each other with restrained politeness. Nothing appears out of place. If you were to pass through it on a quiet afternoon, you might even think that conflict itself had been engineered out of existence.

At the center of the village stands the school.

On its website, the school explains its annual motto with gentle conviction: We pull on the same rope. The children are taught that disagreements should be minimized, that problems should be solved together, that harmony is not only desirable but expected. There is even a symbolic “peace rope,” tied with knots representing the proper order of reconciliation: name the conflict, express feelings, state wishes, apologize.

It is a beautiful idea.

Almost pastoral.

But while the children are learning how not to argue, something very different is unfolding a few administrative doors away.

Reality Is Nazi

There is a peculiar kind of person one encounters more and more often now. They enter the room composed, articulate, certain. They speak as if they have already crossed terrain the rest of us are still mapping. Then reality arrives, unscripted as always, and within minutes the structure collapses. What follows is rarely self-doubt. It is accusation.

Reality, they say, is the problem.

It is too harsh. Too backward. Too unjust. Too full of enemies.

A Middle Path for Navigating Modern Complexity with Wisdom and Grace

People in the West keep returning to Taoism and Buddhism the way city dwellers return to nature documentaries. Something in them knows that what they are living inside is no longer human-scale. The books feel calm. The language feels sane. The ideas feel older than the noise. And then Monday morning arrives, with emails, institutions, bills, deadlines, custody schedules, performance reviews, gas prices, and a phone that never shuts up. Whatever enlightenment felt possible on Sunday night collapses before breakfast.

The problem is not that Taoism or Buddhism are wrong. The problem is that they were never meant for a world like this.

The Epstein Distraction

The most corrosive effect of the Epstein obsession is not what it reveals, but what it immobilizes. The story functions as narrative glue. Once attention sticks to it, it does not move. Moral energy circulates in a closed loop of outrage that feels like awareness but operates as paralysis. People believe they are looking behind the curtain. In practice, they are kept busy staring at a single scene replayed without end.

Epstein no longer operates as a historical case. He has become a Rorschach test.

The Gym, Late Afternoon

The gym is bright in the wrong way. Fluorescent light. Mirrors everywhere. Bodies doing what bodies have always done. Pushing. Pulling. Sweating. You would expect something human to happen. It never does.

People arrive sealed. Headphones in. Eyes straight ahead. Everyone pretending not to look while looking constantly. Desire hangs in the air like stale perfume. Nobody touches it.

That tells you what kind of place this is.

Suicide of a Civilisation

Mental health is not the human default.

That uncomfortable fact was stated with icy clarity by Peter Wessel Zapffe and quietly ignored ever since. Psychological stability is an achievement, not a given. It is produced by filters, illusions, routines, shared stories, and limits. Remove those and you do not get liberation. You get exposure.

Modern society has done exactly that. Systematically. Proudly.

Émile Durkheim diagnosed suicide not as a private failure, but as a social symptom. When norms dissolve and integration fails, people die not because they are weak, but because the structure that once held them together no longer exists. His mistake was stopping at the individual. He did not push the logic to its institutional conclusion.

We are now watching suicide at the level of civilisation.

Post-Legitimacy Governance

A cold winter in Europe. Snow in places where warmer, milder seasons were promised. Ice on the roads. On social media, people no longer debate climate models. They post jokes. Memes. “It’s winter.” “More CO₂ tax.” “Here we go again.” This is usually described as ignorance or denial. It is neither. Cold winters do not disprove climate change. Most people know that. The distinction between weather and climate has been explained for years. Long-term averages, anomalies, jet streams. The information is everywhere, repeated endlessly. What has collapsed is not understanding. It is credibility.

People no longer react to claims. They react to who delivers them and how. When scientific hypotheses are fused with moral imperatives, when urgency replaces persuasion, when dissent is treated as social deviance, content loses authority. Communication stops informing and starts performing. It becomes ritual. Ritual only works as long as belief exists. Once belief disappears, ritual becomes parody. Mockery follows. Not as resistance, but as withdrawal. Mockery signals disengagement.

Karen Is Not Just a Woman: This Should Not Be Happening to Me

For most of my adult life, the system has worked quietly in my favor.

Borders. Police. Offices. Forms. Queues. Officials.

I pass through without friction. Nobody hesitates. Nobody asks a second question. The machine hums, stamps the paper, waves me on.

You don’t consciously think, this is how the world works. That would be crude.

It settles lower than thought. In the nervous system.

And then one day, it doesn’t.

The police stop you.

Ontological Fragmentation and the Death of Mass Culture

What is happening around us is often described as polarization. That word is too small. Polarization assumes a shared axis. It presumes that people are still standing in the same world, merely facing in opposite directions.

What we are dealing with instead is ontological fragmentation. Not disagreement about opinions, but a fracture in the assumptions that make disagreement possible in the first place.

Large groups of people no longer share a moral universe. They do not merely differ on values. They differ on what counts as harm, what counts as truth, what history means, what authority is, what guilt is, what freedom is, what humor is allowed, and whether irony itself is legitimate. They inhabit different models of reality.

Once that happens, mass culture as it existed in the twentieth century becomes structurally impossible.

The Fantasy of the Meta-Position

Dieting is where a deeper political and philosophical lie becomes visible in everyday life.

On the surface, dieting looks trivial. Eat less. Choose differently. Apply willpower. If human beings really possessed the kind of sovereignty modern culture insists we have, dieting would be a technical adjustment, not a recurring failure. You would decide once, and the body would comply.

The fact that entire industries exist to manage repeated failure should already tell us something is wrong with the premise.

Diets fail not because people are ignorant or unmotivated. Most people know exactly what they are supposed to do. They intend to do it. They often begin doing it. And then, somewhere between intention and execution, something else takes over.

This is where the real problem appears. Most diets are built on an implicit fantasy: the fantasy of a meta-position.

2021: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in Switzerland: “I Stand Here With You”

What follows is my report as it appeared in a small Swiss newspaper.

On Thursday evening, I couldn’t believe my eyes when I saw on social media that a demonstration had been announced for November 12, 2021, in Bern, with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as a speaker. It was organized by Public Eye on Science, aka the farmer Urs Hans from the Tösstal. At first I thought it was a joke. But other familiar names were also listed, including Dr. Thomas Binder and the pharmacist Kati Schepis.

As soon as I heard a Kennedy was coming, I asked the editor-in-chief whether he would travel to Bern. He said no. So we agreed I would go as a “reporter” for Die Ostschweiz and capture the mood. On Friday at noon, my daughter and I arrived in Bern. The demonstration was not at the Federal Palace, but in Wankdorf at Rosalia Wenger Square, a place I had never heard of despite having lived in Bern years ago. The location felt chosen to keep the event out of sight.

Radioactive Liability: Why the West Did Not Go After China

The Western response to the origins of COVID-19 only looks puzzling if you take official narratives at face value. Once you stop doing that, it becomes almost boringly obvious.

The West did not hesitate to accuse China because it lacked evidence.

It hesitated because accusing China would have forced Western governments to explain their own role in what was happening in Wuhan.

That was the real danger.

Social Work Without Being Social

There is a particular kind of unease that arises when form and content drift too far apart. I felt it recently in a job interview for a position in social work. On paper, social work is a profession built around human contact, sensitivity, judgment, and presence. In reality, I found myself sitting across from two people who felt more like accountants auditing a balance sheet.

To My Daughter on Her Twelfth Birthday

There is an old philosophy called Stoicism. It began more than two thousand years ago, with people who were trying to figure out how to live well in a world that is often unfair, confusing, and unpredictable. They were not trying to be cold or tough. They were trying to stay clear.

One of the main ideas of Stoicism is very simple:

Some things are up to you.

Some things are not.

NPCs Don’t Suffer

Late at night, dark trailers were placed across a highway in Germany. No lights. No warning. A truck driver barely stopped in time and warned others. Police treated it as attempted murder. Dozens of people could have been killed:

Families returning from a trip. Parents with children asleep in the back seat. Night workers driving home. People with no political power, no role in the conflict, no awareness that they had been drafted into it. One delayed reaction, one second less, and the road would have turned into a mass grave.

Days earlier, critical power infrastructure was sabotaged in Berlin’s winter grid. Tens of thousands of households were affected for a week.

In many high-rise buildings, elderly people were trapped in cold apartments without functioning heaters or stoves. Elevators stopped running. Some could not leave their homes. Hospitals were affected. Lives were put at risk, quietly and unevenly, behind closed doors.

All of this for a "political" cause.

What connects these events is not ideology.

It is perception.

Was Hitler Left or Right?

The claim that Hitler was “left-wing” does not come from historical study. It comes from present-day political irritation projected backward. It is an emotional sorting reflex masquerading as analysis: everything I dislike must belong to the other side.

That reflex does not clarify history. It erases it.

To understand where fascism belongs, you have to step out of contemporary culture war categories and return to intellectual lineage. The left-right distinction did not begin as a meme war. It emerged from a real philosophical split after Hegel.

After Hegel’s death, his legacy fractured.

State of the European Union

The European Union reaffirmed its commitment to unity.

Several member states expressed reservations.

The measures are temporary.

A review will follow after implementation.

There was no alternative.

All options remain on the table.

The decision was taken in the interest of citizens.

Public confidence remains a challenge.

National sovereignty is fully respected.

Compliance is mandatory.

The West in Stereo

If you put today’s America and today’s Europe next to each other, you don’t see harmony or balance. You see a structural failure unfolding in stereo.

On the American side, volatility has become a governing principle. Under Donald Trump, politics is performed as pressure. Threats are floated, withdrawn, re-floated. Tariffs appear and disappear. Alliances are questioned in public. NATO is treated less like a foundation than like a bargaining chip. Even Greenland is spoken about as if geopolitics were a real-estate listing. Nothing is fully committed to, nothing fully abandoned. The signal is permanent instability.

On the European side, the problem is the opposite. Not volatility, but rigidity. Institutions cling to procedure as reality shifts underneath them. Free speech is narrowed in the name of safety. Political competition is moralized instead of fought. In Germany, the largest opposition party is not confronted argument by argument, but fenced off as illegitimate. Migration is treated as an administrative inevitability rather than a political choice. Courts, regulators, and ministries respond to political stress with the same reflex: more rules, tighter language codes, longer processes. Debt rises, productivity stagnates, and the answer is always another layer of governance.

America moves too fast.

Europe refuses to move at all.

Donald Trump and the Price of Volatility

Donald Trump was in Switzerland last week, speaking in Davos at the World Economic Forum. By coincidence, I was there too, though nowhere near him. The closest I came was by mistake. I got lost while looking for a place to park, took a wrong turn, and suddenly found myself in front of his hotel, boxed in by barriers and about twenty masked policemen, with dogs and mirrors sliding under cars. I rolled down my window and put on the most innocent Swiss face I have. They didn’t make a fuss, but it was enough to feel the density of real-world power.

Davos has that effect. It compresses things. Influence, proximity, authority. Trump’s appearance there felt the same way. Not a new chapter, not a surprise, but a concentration. The style, the signaling, the reversals, the noise, all packed into a single appearance. If you want to understand what has been building throughout his presidency, Davos was not a detour. It was the moment when the pattern became visible at scale.

Seen that way, the confusion around Trump starts to make sense.

The Infection Without a Virus

We Have No Future

Most read eassay